Sitemeter


W3 Counter


« Join Mr. Dawntreader In D.C. At The Wilberforce Weekend ( Jan '07 ) | Main | The New Religious Synthesis »

December 10, 2006

Comments

Notwithstanding the earnest efforts of philosophical materialists such as Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris, it seems belief in the supernatural just won't go away.

As you note, this is a double-edged sword. Because a general belief in the supernatural is up, not just the "good kind." I suspect you'll see that belief in the sort of "new age" and occult type stuff that is an anethema to Christianity is also at or near a record high.

The problem for believers is that there's simply no reliable way to differentiate the "good" supernatural beliefs from the "bad" ones. You cannot disprove the beliefs of astrology or Wicca or voodoo or anything other such belief system, any more than I can disprove the beliefs of Christianity. And for precisely the same reasons.

When the only way we have of knowing what's true and what's not is ultimately through faith, then there's simply no way of really knowing whether or not our faith is properly entrusted.

As to why belief in the supernatural is on the rise (and, related to this, why those beliefs aren't very Christian-like), I'd suggest that this is because people have a tendency to believe what they want to believe as opposed to what's necessarily true. So I suspect you'd argue that this belief in the supernatural is for all the wrong reasons.

Bringing it back around, the problem for the Christian (or for any believer in the supernatural) is coming up with a coherent system of beliefs that allows one to differentiate meaningfully between the "good" supernatural beliefs, and the "bad" ones. Instead, such distinctions seem (from my POV) to be mostly arbitrary.

"I'd suggest that this is because people have a tendency to believe what they want to believe as opposed to what's necessarily true. "

Isn't this true of you? How do you know you are not succumbing to the temptation to believe what you want to believe?

Hey, hey, hey! This time I'm the one asking the "how do you know you have the straight stick" questions! It's my turn to play Columbo. :)

To sort-of answer your question, the best I can do is recognize the human tendency to allow what we want to be true to influence our beliefs about what is true, and attempt to correct for it. But the fight against wishful thinking is an ongoing one.

I will say that I have a number of deeply-held beliefs that I would love to be wrong about. So I don't think that necessarily constitutes wishful thinking.

But getting back to you, how do you know you've got the straight stick? And how can others verify that the stick is indeed straight, or find that straight stick for themselves?

"I will say that I have a number of deeply-held beliefs that I would love to be wrong about."

Such as?

"how do you know you've got the straight stick?"

First, will you agree with me that the straight stick must be external? In other words, we cannot measure the truth of our beliefs from a standard within ourselves. Agreed?

The comments to this entry are closed.